Over the past week or two, Toni Ingram has tried to perpetuate the idea that in the days prior to Morgan Ingram’s death, an arrest of Keenan Vanginkel was imminent.
On July 9, 2013 Toni Ingram wrote:
Keenan would know that the record of his hours working for City Market was going to be handed over the Sheriff’s department the following week. Not only did the Detective think that, “if anything, the stalking was going to escalate.” He would ask for, and receive increased patrols, an extra one or two a night. And they would all be 100% focused up on our roof. What did they find out? And why did they not share it with us? http://morganingram.com/wordpress/?p=4169
On June 14, 2013 Toni wrote:
- Nov 29, 2011 – before 5:00 PM Detective Glassmire is over at our house and tells me that he is 100% certain that Keenan Vanginkel is the stalker.
- Nov 29, 2011 – before 5:00 PM Detective Glassmire tells me that he believes the stalking is going to escalate.
- Nov 29, 2011 – before 5:00 PM Detective Glassmire tells me that he will be picking up Keenan’s work record from City Market that coming Tuesday (same day Morgan is due to give her official statement), and when he overlays that work schedule with my timeline he is confident he will be very close to making an arrest for Felony Stalking. http://morganingram.com/wordpress/?p=4058
The above statement (in bold) got me thinking.
According to Toni and Steve Ingram, police dropped the stalking investigation like a bad habit after Morgan died. However, detectives did pick up Keenan’s work records, as evidenced by their presence in the supplemental reports. This tells me that on Tuesday December 6, 2011 police were still looking at Keenan Vanginkel in relation to the stalking of Morgan Ingram. Why didn’t detectives make the follow-up arrest Toni writes about? According to Toni the only thing police had to do was compare Keenan’s work schedule with her timeline and Keenan would be arrested for felony stalking. So what happened? Why was there no arrest?
It doesn’t take a genius to realize the work records/timeline overlay was not the smoking gun for which the Ingrams hoped.
Curious to see what was learned from the side by side comparison, I decided to create one.
A couple of things stand out:
First is how quickly the Ingrams concluded Morgan was being stalked. Only seven days passed between the day Morgan returned from California and the purchase of the outdoor motion alarm. In that seven day period there is one event that stands out. and that’s the hard bang on the bathroom window after Morgan closed it.
Second is the degree in which the work records exculpate Keenan Vanginkel. They clearly show Keenan could not be responsible for some of the most significant events, including the night the “stalker” was photographed in the driveway.
A few notes on formatting:
These were done in Excel and converted to .pdf (Acrobat Professional). and .jpg. The conversion from Excel is quirky so readers might notice some appearance issues here and there. For best viewing, I recommend downloading the pdf files However, I realize some people are not comfortable doing that, so I’ve provided .jpgs that can be viewed in the browser.
I have tried to be as accurate as possible and have double, triple, and sometimes quadruple checked all sources. It is a work in progress. Readers please let me know if you notice any errors.
This is the data for August and September 2011. I will upload October and November/December as soon as there finished.
August 22, 2011 Upon further reflection, I should have made the Aug 22 event reported in the blog teal rather than green. Toni said she woke to the sound of the lock beeping. The reliability of something Toni heard while asleep is suspect.
August 30, 2011 In her blog Toni places the date they captured the stalker on wildlife camera as Aug 29, 2011. This is somewhat misleading. The incident that prompted the call to police occurred on the 29th and the call to dispatch was logged at 23:55 or 11:55 PM. Dispatch notified officers at 1:05 AM and officers report they arrived at the Ingram home at 1:20 AM. Unfortunately, things get muddy from here. The timestamp on the wildlife cam picture shows the first deputy leaving at 00:43 which is 12:43 AM. The next picture shows two more deputies leaving at 00:44 or 12:44 AM. This begs the question, how could police be leaving at 12:45 AM if they didn’t even arrive until 1:20 AM? The”stalker” picture is stamped 00:46 or 12:46 AM. The final picture is what Toni says is the stalker trying to break the camera. That picture is stamped 00:48 or 12:48 AM. Obviously someone’s time line is not correct. I think we can all reasonably conclude whose interest would be served by altering the time. However, it could also be a simple mistake. In the end it is irrelevant. Keenan Vanginkel could not be in two places at once. He couldn’t be on the Ingram’s roof at 12:48 AM trying to knock down the camera and punching in at work exactly 10 minutes later.
Sept 3, 2011 When police were called about the Sept 5 incident Toni reports they went to the Harris home and spoke with Brooke. This is also detailed in the police report.
Brooke spoke with the deputy but told him Keenan was asleep and therefore not available. Toni did not believe Brooke and felt she was covering for Keenan.
I’ve worked hours similar to Keenan’s the majority of my adult life. Based on my own experience, alongside info shared by coworkers, it is my opinion that Keenan was quite likely sleeping, just as Brooke said.
Let’s look at Keenan Vanginkel’s schedule: On 9-3-2011 Keenan got off work around lunch time. He probably went home, ate lunch, watched TV or played video games or something similar in an attempt to unwind. He may have tried to take a nap.
He probably experienced some difficulty if he did try to sleep because doing so would go against his body’s natural circadian rhythm. Later as the sun went down, his pineal gland would begin to secrete melatonin and already sleep deprived from working nights, he most likely couldn’t keep from falling asleep until he had to go to work.
This is only my opinion, but as I said, it comes from 20 years of personal experience. When I worked midnights it was always my habit to go to sleep after dinner and then wake and go right into work. Consequently, the statement that Keenan was asleep doesn’t strike me as unusual.
Labor Day Weekend I’ve colored these events yellow because no time is given for the reported events.
I have followed the tragedy of Morgan Ingram for nine months. Over this period of time my view of Morgan’s mother Toni Ingram has evolved.
I always viewed the stalking story dubiously but in the beginning I saw Toni as a grieving mother whose obvious inability to grasp simple logic was interfering with her ability to come to terms with her daughter’s suicide. A foolish and simplistic conclusion borne of, I am ashamed to say, my own intellectual arrogance.
Over time, my opinion has done a complete 180. I no longer believe Toni is struggling to come to terms with her grief. I now believe she wears her grief like a badge. She revels in the sympathy it brings her and she will do anything necessary to ensure it continues.
Toni Ingram is not like most of us. I believe she operates without the burden of a conscience telling her what is right and what is wrong.
Here is an example:
Yesterday I blogged about Toni going to the police to say Mayra Martinez was calling on the phone and harassing her. To add credibility to her claim she provided falsified phone records (go here to read the piece in its entirety)
Now, I would imagine, most people, upon learning that the police knew they lied, would NOT turn around and expand upon that lie.
However, as we all know, Toni Ingram is not like most people. Not only has she continued to perpetuate her original lie, she has now added greater embellishment, calling on her supporters to report any calls they receive from Eugene Oregon (where Mayra lives) to local law enforcement. She has even gone as far as claiming Mayra’s business contacts have joined in the alleged harassment. For those who do not know, Mayra owns a crime scene cleanup business. Someone please tell me, how someone convinces their crime scene cleanup connections to assist them in harassing total strangers ? Maybe Toni doesn’t realize this, but in the real world people do not call upon their business contacts and ask them to break the law.; it tends to limit referrals.
Of course Toni doesn’t say these things through her own Twitter account. She uses one of her sock puppet accounts. Make no mistakes though, Toni Ingram controls all content tweeted through this user.
Let me cut to the chase:
Put up or shut up Toni. We challenge you to prove even one of the unfounded allegations made against us. If you believe we have called and harassed your supporters, prove it, post the phone records
However, it’s only fair that I warn you before you doctor any more records and take them to the police, doing so is a felony.
Title 18. CRIMINAL CODE
Article 8. Offenses – Governmental Operations
Part 3. BRIBERY AND CORRUPT INFLUENCES
Current through Chapter 430, Second Regular Session 2010
§ 18-8-306. Attempt to influence a public servant
Any person who attempts to influence any public servant by means of deceit or by threat of violence or economic reprisal against any person or property, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning any matter which is to be considered or performed by him or the agency or body of which he is a member, commits a class 4 felony.
May 13, 2013
Surprise! Keenan Vanginkel’s criminal history barely resembles Toni Ingram’s description.
On 10 May 2013 Toni Ingram wrote:
Which brings up the third piece of advice which I have found to be a very informative, and a useful tool – that is to get the criminal records of the stalker, especially a stranger stalker. As the claims that he has never been in trouble in his life grow ever louder from all of his family, the list of charges, for a twenty-one year old seem very, very, long. And most all of the charges he has been found guilty of portend to a serious problem if connected with a stranger stalker, as they are in Morgan’s case.
Toni has written several times about Keenan’s so called criminal record. In the above quote and in previous blogs, she has consistently presented it as extensive. Although she has not made that record available via Morgan’s Stalking, she has shared it through her Twitter sock account (@SupportIngrams) and with her Twitter followers They in turn have made it publicly available through their hate sites and Twitter pages. Readers who wish to see it may do so at one of the following Twitter account pages:
https://twitter.com/SupportIngrams (this is Toni Ingram)
It is located in the left hand column under “view all videos and photos.”
Here is the problem with this document:
It is not Keenan Vanginkel’s criminal record.
What Toni Ingram calls an extensive criminal record is actually a global subject activity report.
The global subject activity report is a record of a citizen’s interaction with law enforcement. The activity report can contain items unrelated to criminal activity. For example, if I am a witness to a car accident or if I am stopped for speeding and given a warning, or even if I am the victim of a crime, it would all be entered on my global subject activity report, A glance at Keenan Vanginkel’s GSAR shows multiple items where criminal charges weren’t applicable, including an impounded vehicle, witnessing a crime, and a trespassing accusation on Aug 25, 2011 courtesy of the Ingrams.
Last week I ordered a copy of Keenan Vanginkel’s criminal history; his real criminal history. I ordered it from CBI which is the agency Toni repeatedly has said should have been brought in to investigate Morgan’s death.
Not exactly the record of a criminal mastermind ninja stalker.
I know I shouldn’t be surprised at the level to which Steve and Toni Ingram will sink, yet I am. I just don’t understand what is wrong with these people. How can Steve and Toni, along with those who actively lie on their behalf, stand the very sight of themselves?
Just one last thing.
Of what charge was Keenan found guilty that “portends” predicts, foretells, prognosticates, or adumbrates, pick a word any of them will do, “a serious problem” if connected to a stranger stalker? Tell us Toni, which one of Keenan’s crimes do you consider the great harbinger of future stalking events? Was it the marijuana possession or was it the drug paraphernalia charge?
If smoking pot leads to stalking, most residents of Colorado should watch their backs; they could find themselves on someone’s suspect list.